halkeye at gmail.com
Tue Jun 2 00:20:03 UTC 2009
I think its interesting to point out that some code detects this and
In my above example, client #2 eventually sees client #1 online when
the next presence tag is sent to the server.
And it works if client #2 comes on first, then client #1
My psi (client #2) and my roster building code all are in lower case.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Alex Vandiver <alexmv at bestpractical.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 17:07 -0700, Martin Atkins wrote:
>> No, that was not addressed. I don't think there was consensus on how
>> best to handle backward compatibility.
>> I'm happy to merge it if I'm mistaken and there was some consensus on this.
> I've not seen anyone actually complain about backwards compatability.
> But my most recent patchset includes both conversion tools to upgrade
> those who are being silently bitten by this, as well as a flag which can
> be enabled to preserve the current broken behavior, if they so choose.
> I don't recall anyone being explicitly dissatisfied with the those
> options for dealing with the backcompat issue.
> - Alex
More information about the Djabberd