Perl's autoflush() and Gearman workers

[Brad Fitzpatrick]

Not that I know of!  :-)

I'm surprised to hear gearmand is anybody's bottleneck, though.  And if it
is, you can just add more.  It scales out linearly.

I assume everybody's on a modern Linux with epoll?

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Matt Sergeant <matt at sergeant.org> wrote:

> On 9-Jan-08, at 3:52 AM, Chris Goffinet wrote:
>
> > :) Before I spend lots of time profiling, analyzing whats the
> > bottleneck in gearmand (perl) I'd like to spend 5 minutes compiling
> > gearmand c version to see if I notice anything different speed
> > wise. Than at least I have something to compare profile wise to see
> > where things are going slower.
>
> There's a C version of gearmand somewhere?
> _______________________________________________
> Gearman mailing list
> Gearman at lists.danga.com
> http://lists.danga.com/mailman/listinfo/gearman
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/gearman/attachments/20080311/a5333ca9/attachment.htm