Not that I know of! :-)<br><br>I'm surprised to hear gearmand is anybody's bottleneck, though. And if it is, you can just add more. It scales out linearly.<br><br>I assume everybody's on a modern Linux with epoll?<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Matt Sergeant <<a href="mailto:matt@sergeant.org">matt@sergeant.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On 9-Jan-08, at 3:52 AM, Chris Goffinet wrote:<br>
<br>
> :) Before I spend lots of time profiling, analyzing whats the<br>
> bottleneck in gearmand (perl) I'd like to spend 5 minutes compiling<br>
> gearmand c version to see if I notice anything different speed<br>
> wise. Than at least I have something to compare profile wise to see<br>
> where things are going slower.<br>
<br>
</div>There's a C version of gearmand somewhere?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Gearman mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gearman@lists.danga.com">Gearman@lists.danga.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.danga.com/mailman/listinfo/gearman" target="_blank">http://lists.danga.com/mailman/listinfo/gearman</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>