flush_all is broken?
brianm at dealnews.com
Sat May 13 22:26:19 UTC 2006
Martin Blais wrote:
> Am I missing something about the meaning of flush_all?
> I just tested with 1.1.13-pre, and I get the same problem.
This has been covered on the list before. The flush is not as atomic as
you might think. Immediate sets after a flush "could" happen before the
I believe there was a patch proposed to make this not happen. Check the
Its good to be cheap =)
More information about the memcached