flush_all is broken?

[Brian Moon]

Martin Blais wrote:
> Am I missing something about the meaning of flush_all?
> I just tested with 1.1.13-pre, and I get the same problem.

This has been covered on the list before.  The flush is not as atomic as 
you might think.  Immediate sets after a flush "could" happen before the 
flush occurs.

I believe there was a patch proposed to make this not happen.  Check the 
list archives.

-- 

Brian Moon
-------------
http://dealnews.com/
Its good to be cheap =)