Simple questions from memcached newbie

Brad Fitzpatrick brad at danga.com
Thu Oct 12 00:38:13 UTC 2006


Because we want to do more than 10 operations per second.  :)

But what would that even buy us?  Not distributed like NDB.



On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, NTPT wrote:

> and what about SQLITE as storage backend  ?
> (just dumb question....)
>
>
> >  ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
> >  Od: Andy <memcached at thwartedefforts.org>
> >  Předmět: Re: Simple questions from memcached newbie
> >  Datum: 12.10.2006 00:37:10
> >  ----------------------------------------
> >  On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 12:45 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> >  > On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Jeetendra Mirchandani wrote:
> >  >
> >  > > Going a little off topic here, has somebody worked on writing a data
> >  > > redundancy layer over memcached?
> >  > >
> >  > > What I would love to have is memcached servers talking to each other
> >  > > maintaining replicas, so that even if a server goes down, the data is
> >  > > not lost.
> >  >
> >  > The default reply is "you want MySQL Cluster".
> >  >
> >  > Since people keep wanting to use the memcached interface for this,
> >  > maybe MySQL Cluster (as in NDB) could be a storage backend for
> >  > memcached.
> >
> >  The difference here is that memcached is at least an order of magnitude
> >  easier to setup and maintain than MySQL cluster, and adding an
> >  additional "storage backend" on memcached means you need to maintain two
> >  sets of software (memcached and mysql cluster) rather than one (for no
> >  advantage really, since NDB is a memory based store, just like
> >  memcached) resulting in increased complexity.
> >
> >  A memcached client interface on MySQL would help people transition,
> >  ahem, away from memcached (or it might bring users into the fold).
> >
> >  Memcached remains dead simple to setup and dead simple to use and dead
> >  simple to make more "reliable", by either changing your client code to
> >  make the client "smarter" (to send/try multiple servers, for example),
> >  or by adding additional nodes to reduce the percentage of data on any
> >  single node to whatever low amount you feel is appropriate.  These are
> >  most definitely _virtues_ of memcached.
> >
> >  --
> >  Andy <memcached at thwartedefforts.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


More information about the memcached mailing list