Large memory support?

[Mark Jaffe]

As a follow-up to this mention of 1.1.13 prereleases, is there any  
estimate of when this will be released?

Mark
On Sep 2, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Steven Grimm wrote:

> Which version are you using? 1.1.12 only supported 32-bit cache  
> sizes, so my hunch is that's what you're using. If you try one of  
> the 1.1.13 prereleases (or search the mailing list archive for my  
> large memory support patch) you should be in good shape. The  
> current version of the code supports large memory just fine; most  
> of our cache servers are over 10GB each.
>
> -Steve
>
>
> Jeremy wrote:
>> Using memcached now on a x86_64 with 16gigs of memory.  It seems  
>> memcached
>> is topping out at about 2gigs.  Does memcached have large memory  
>> support?
>> This is my running process:
>>
>> memcached -d -p 11211 -u nobody -c 1024 -m 14336
>>
>> I'd like to use up to 14gigs.
>>
>>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
>> 22371 nobody    15   0 2074m 2.0g  272 S    3 12.3 201:53.39  
>> memcached
>>
>> And it's not growing beyond 2gig.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Mark Jaffe
markie at ydl.net
408-807-2093 (cell)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/attachments/20060902/d6139888/attachment.htm