Memcache slow on OS X

[Brad Fitzpatrick]

I smell a FAQ coming on.  I would've never figured this out without some
stracing / source reading.

I'm wondering if UDP should default to same port as TCP, or default to
off.

Any preferences?


On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Hao Zheng wrote:

> Did you specify UDP port in both instances?  It is 11211 by default, and
> hence the 2nd instance won't start if it is not specified.
>
> --hao
>
> Randy Wigginton wrote:
> > Is there some reason that with the 1.2 version I cannot run two
> > instances on my macOSX listening on different ports?  Didn't have this
> > problem with 1.12
> >
> > On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Steven Grimm wrote:
> >
> >> The 1.2.0 branch of memcached is fine on OS X. I do a lot of my
> >> memcached hacking on my MacBook Pro. The TCP_NOPUSH thing is no longer
> >> relevant in the 1.2.0 code; we did away with that in favor of a
> >> different approach which is more portable.
> >>
> >> -Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> Marcus Bointon wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the pointers. I've forwarded them to the maintainer of the
> >>> memcached macports package, so hopefully this fix can get out to the
> >>> wider world more easily.
> >>>
> >>> Marcus
> >>> --Marcus Bointon
> >>> Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/
> >>> marcus at synchromedia.co.uk | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>