branches/binary-1.3.0

[Dustin Sallings]

   sorry I haven't been able to do my own integration.  My normal  
machine's in the garage.

   I should be able to check this out on my work machine and at least  
verify all my tests pass.

   Of course, I welcome any question as to the validity of my tests.

-- 
Dustin Sallings (mobile)

On Dec 3, 2007, at 0:32, dormando <dormando at rydia.net> wrote:

> ... is in SVN.
>
> Pulled from Dustin's tree, and gleefully applied all three of his  
> patch
> series into a single svn commit. Dustin; I understand svn branch  
> (yeuch)
> a little better now, and can redo that into three commits in about two
> minutes if you think it's any better ;)
>
> I haven't tested the code, but I gave it a brief review and believe  
> it's
> good as a starting point.
>
> Now we need to:
>
> - Get more peer review. Find the bugs, write tests, etc.
> - Style inconsistencies. Nitpicky but helps combined development
> (memcached could use more of this in general. so obvious 10+ people  
> have
> patched it).
> - Finish any missing features?
> - Performance test, blah blah.
> - Documentation. Binary protocol doc, usage doc, etc.
>
> Uhh. What else? I want to give it a thorough review to understand that
> it doesn't leak memory or overwrite its own buffers, but I've been
> pretty gosh darn sick for the last four days so it hasn't been done by
> me yet. I know a ton of crazy people read this list tho, so please go
> crazy and find out! :)
>
> I'd absolutely love to have the process of hammering out 1.3.0 done
> within two weeks. There's not a lot of code here and the theory's not
> difficult. The potential client benefits are huge.
>
> Thanks!
> -Dormando
>
>