new .net client for memcached

[Roberto Spadim]

what about using swig to write client protocol? we just need to select 
what language and compile.. no time spend creating one interface for 
each language

KevinImNotSpacey escreveu:
> This client looks really good for .NET.  For instance the open source 
> client listed on danga doesn't fail very well when you pull the 
> connection on one of the servers in the pool, you get a flood of 
> exceptions.  This client much more correctly flags the server as down, 
> removes it from the list and then checks to see if its back up at a 
> later time.
>
> That alone is really sweet.  Using native .NET configs is nice too, 
> the class design is also much more extensible.  Everyone will have to 
> customize the client for their environment and this client will be 
> easy customize.
>
> I would like to add the ability to define different "bins" or groups 
> of servers for different cache purposes, instead of having the one big 
> list, we can discuss offline.  The only other thing i see right off is 
> that I'll need to remove the log4net debug calls for our prod 
> environment, but that's not a big deal.
>
> Thank you very much for sharing this code, hopefully we can help 
> contribute back, I'll be setting it up and testing this week and next.
>
> Thanks!
> Kevin
>
> On 7/6/07, *a.* <a at enyim.com <mailto:a at enyim.com>> wrote:
>
>     we could argue which is more complete. my personal opinion is that
>     ported code usually doesn't take advantage of the target platform,
>     but mirrors an implementation which was tailored for the source
>     platform.
>
>     even if .net and java are similar, a code written for java can under/
>     over perform on .net.
>
>     additionally i did not feel comfortable with the architecture of the
>     ported code, mainly with the locking and server pool handling.
>
>     the description page on code plex is not finished yet (my bad), so
>     let me list the main features of my client
>
>     - it's configurable thru app/web.config, no more 10-20 line init
>     codes for the client
>     - written specially for .net, not ported, using the latest features
>     of the framework
>     - better (hopefully) locking providing better throughput
>     - uses consistent hashing for keys (based on ketama, found on the
>     list some months before)
>     - keys are hashed using FNV hash, much faster than md5 and have
>     better dispersion than the Object.GetHashCode()
>     - operations are factored into separate classes, so they are more
>     separated from the main client class, easier manageability and thread
>     safety
>     - more clients -> more options -> more competition -> better clients
>
>
>
>     a.
>
>
>
>
>
>     On Jul 6, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Antonello Provenzano wrote:
>
>     > Thank you for the support, but honestly I don't see the
>     advantage of
>     > using your library rather than Memcached.NET
>     > (https://sourceforge.net/projects/memcacheddotnet/), that is more
>     > complete and based on the Java client.
>     >
>     > Cheers.
>     > Antonello
>     >
>     >
>     > On 7/6/07, a. <a at enyim.com <mailto:a at enyim.com>> wrote:
>     >> hello list,
>     >>
>     >> Previously I mentioned I had to create a client for one of my
>     >> projects from scratch.
>     >>
>     >> I'd like to announce that I've released it under a BSD like license
>     >> at http://www.codeplex.com/EnyimMemcached
>     <http://www.codeplex.com/EnyimMemcached>
>     >>
>     >> The state of the project is "works for me", but there can be
>     bugs in
>     >> it, so do not roll out in production before trying it out ;]
>     >>
>     >> If you have questions or comments feel free to comment me
>     directly,
>     >> or ask on the list if your question might concern others.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> a.
>     >>
>     >> --
>     >> enyim.com <http://enyim.com>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra 
> <http://mail.terra.com.br/>.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 06/07/2007 / Versão: 
> 5.1.00/5069
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/