md5 as the key
venkatesh.ks at gmail.com
Fri Sep 7 08:48:11 UTC 2007
if keys are uri which could go upto a few hundred bytes then md5 would make
It all boils down the number of entries per bucket.
I could hash on only 8 bytes and use the other 8 bytes for actual
On 9/7/07, Dustin Sallings <dustin at spy.net> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2007, at 0:34, Venkatesh KS wrote:
> memcached supports variable length keys. But I am just curious as to why
> not use md5 instead of lengthy keys. The keylen requirements for my cache
> (which is very similar to squid proxy) is very high and I am planning on
> using md5. I will read up to find out about the false positive probability.
> But going md5 way will certainly cap the keylen to 16bytes.
> You certainly can, but md5(``somestring'') is a lot more costly to compute
> than ``somestring''
> Dustin Sallings
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the memcached