I'm currently working on 'remastering' a knoppix cd to create diskless nodes that we can easily bring up. Do you know offhand if the standard knoppix kernel comes with EPoll enabled or will I have to recompile?<br><br><div>
<span class="gmail_quote">On 1/8/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Paul Querna</b> <<a href="mailto:chip@corelands.com">chip@corelands.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Maxim Mass wrote:<br>> First of all, big thanks to everyone contributing to this project --<br>> this is a truly cool idea and it's helping our site performance a hell<br>> of a lot.<br>><br>> I'm currently running 10 3ghz Xeon machines with -- temporarily -- a gig
<br>> of ram each on the 2.4 kernel. My concern is that I'm seeing an average<br>> of about 40% system cpu usage with only 2% usermode usage. Looking at<br>> the stats, each box is being hit at roughly 1100 get/set requests a
<br>> second and reading about 71kb/s while writing 361kb/s. Would moving to<br>> 2.6 reduce cpu load? Turning off hyperthreading?<br><br>2.6 will reduce CPU load, assuming you have EPoll enabled correctly.<br><br>
-Paul<br><br></blockquote></div><br>