Hello - <br><br>Thanks so much for getting back to me.<br><br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/20/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ask Bjørn Hansen</b> <<a href="mailto:ask@develooper.com">ask@develooper.com</a>
> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>On Jul 20, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Andrew B. Westmoreland wrote:<br><br>[....]
<br><br>Did you try putting memcached on another host with free CPU?</blockquote><div><br>We have not tried this. We made the assumption that network IO would cause latency, but now that I think of it, it seems that the saturated CPU could be a source of latency as well.
<br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">(Is the 300 vs 600ms *per db/memcached query* ?!)</blockquote><div><br><br>Yes, this is per basic query.
<br><br>Thank you again.<br><br>Andrew B. Westmoreland<br>Founder<br>Progressing Markets <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
- ask<br><br>--<br><a href="http://develooper.com/">http://develooper.com/</a> - <a href="http://askask.com/">http://askask.com/</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>