Ah... My mistake.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 13, 2007 8:32 AM, Tomash Brechko <<a href="mailto:tomash.brechko@gmail.com">tomash.brechko@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:05:18 -0500, Josef Finsel wrote:<br>> I voted for tags so I could quickly invalidate portions of the cache. Rather<br>> than have to track all of the keys associated with my *foo *data, I could
<br>> tag each key with the foo tag and then do a *tagdelete foo* or something<br>> similar and memcached would simple do a delete of the keys that match that<br>> value.<br><br></div>Got that, that would be useful. But that would be another use of
<br>tags, not the same as described in binary protocol paper, where tags<br>are opaque and simply copied from request to reply. Those tags are<br>solely to save on sending back key names, or so I understood it.<br><br><br>
--<br><font color="#888888"> Tomash Brechko<br></font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"If you see a whole thing - it seems that it's always beautiful. Planets, lives... But up close a world's all dirt and rocks. And day to day, life's a hard job, you get tired, you lose the pattern."
<br>Ursula K. Le Guin