brad at danga.com
Thu Jun 15 22:35:42 UTC 2006
Yeah, totally unrelated. Nothing regarding the protocol is changing, just
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, dormando wrote:
> Is it safe to patch mogadm with the rest of the updates going on to mogile?
> Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > Yes, mogadm needs work. Patches welcome.
> > That said, I don't think there should be a way to delete a device. It's
> > very important you never re-use device numbers, so all I want to allow is
> > marking a disk dead.
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Jay Buffington wrote:
> >> It's my understanding that mogadm is a work in progress. There are
> >> several functions that aren't implemented.
> >> You're right, you'd need to add both MogileFS::Admin::delete_device
> >> and cmd_device_delete.
> >> Jay
> >> On 6/15/06, komtanoo.pinpimai at livetext.com
> >> <komtanoo.pinpimai at livetext.com> wrote:
> >>> >From the cvs, in mogadm, I notice that cmd_device_mark and
> >>> cmd_device_delete are doing nothing, which means if a parition dies, we
> >>> can't remove it without typing in mysql directly. cmd_device_mark should
> >>> works in the similar way of cmd_host_mark but calls change_device_state in
> >>> MogileFS::Admin instead. But cmd_device_delete is not that easy, becuase
> >>> there is no MogileFS::Admin::delete_device. So I wonder if I need to write
> >>> it myself ? Why the two functions are blank ?
More information about the mogilefs