Perlbal-Long polling Vs Jabber

Brad Fitzpatrick brad at danga.com
Tue Aug 8 16:14:57 UTC 2006


Still not getting the question.

They're both event-based, using the same underlying framework, so
connections are just as cheap.... neither would be more advantageous.
DJabberd will do long-polling HTTP mode (for Jabber) in time here.


On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Prateek Mathur wrote:

> ok I meant a Jabber Server implementation with Perlbal(with long polling) :)
>
> Prateek.
>
>
>
> On 8/8/06, Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask at develooper.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Aug 8, 2006, at 3:08 AM, Prateek Mathur wrote:
> >
> > > What comparison could be there with perlbal long polling(delayed
> > > connection response) vs Jabber, in terms of 1) scalability 2)load
> > > balancing capability 3)usage?
> >
> > You are comparing a piece of software (perlbal, implementing http)
> > with a protocol (jabber).
> >
> >
> > - ask
> >
> >
>


More information about the perlbal mailing list