Just created:<br><br><a href="http://code.google.com/p/perlbal/">http://code.google.com/p/perlbal/</a><br><br>It has wiki, bug tracking, source browsing, etc. The thing I like about its wiki is that it's just an svn directory, so you can edit it via either method (web or svn), and it retains history about who edited the wiki how/when.<br>
<br>I hereby bless it as the place for the wiki, FAQ, etc.<br><br>Give me and/or Dormando your Google account's email address and we'll add you as a member, so you can contribute to the wiki. Which also means you'll be able to commit to svn, should we ever put the code there too, but the social contract will enforce ACLs: you don't do what you're told you can't do. Normal commit policies[1] would still apply.<br>
<br>[1] <a href="http://danga.com/commit.bml">http://danga.com/commit.bml</a><b></b><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:01 PM, dormando <<a href="mailto:dormando@rydia.net">dormando@rydia.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Yeah. Definitely.<br>
<br>
If you find yourself needing a load balancing algorithm at all, please<br>
share with the list :) There're a few of us who'd love to preach the<br>
simple way.<br>
<br>
It'd be nice to just start a wiki FAQ thing for perlbal we could fill<br>
out. I'm too lazy to decide where it'd go though :)<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-Dormando<br>
</font><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:<br>
> I'm against it because it's deceptive. It makes people think it does<br>
> something and it doesn't, really.<br>
><br>
> If you see a measurable effect, I'd love to see numbers and your<br>
> (mis-?)configuration.<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Paul Baker™ <<a href="mailto:bakerp@google.com">bakerp@google.com</a><br>
</div><div class="Ih2E3d">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:bakerp@google.com">bakerp@google.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Who doesn't have a weighted random patch? Mine's at<br>
> <a href="http://givetheworld.net/perlbal-weighted-random.patch" target="_blank">http://givetheworld.net/perlbal-weighted-random.patch</a><br>
><br>
> :-D<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Jonty <<a href="mailto:jonty@last.fm">jonty@last.fm</a><br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jonty@last.fm">jonty@last.fm</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 15:51 -0700, Mark Smith wrote:<br>
> > > AFAIK, perlbal actually only supports the "random"<br>
> load-balancing algorithm.<br>
> > > I've never actually tried using round-robin, but the last<br>
> time I was in the<br>
> > > source-code I thought I remember there being code to throw<br>
> an error if<br>
> > > anything other than "random" was specified.<br>
> ><br>
> > Yeah, it's random. At one point I wrote a patch to make weighted<br>
> > random, but never got it committed...<br>
><br>
> I've got a similar patch to send upstream, I'll see if I can<br>
> make some<br>
> time for that. I also implemented normal round-robin, just for<br>
> the hell<br>
> of it.<br>
><br>
> --jonty<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>