Field separators, again
paul at ciphergoth.org
Wed Jun 8 03:26:57 PDT 2005
Ken Horn wrote:
>>> "digest_type" in place of "auth_type",
>> Definitely not. What if the next revision uses UMAC?
> what does auth mean? Authentication? Authorisation? Auth of what/who?
> To whom? I prefer digest, but maybe that's because I don't really know the
> difference between a digest and a MAC. How about "hash_type", cos to me,
> they're all just fancy hash algorithms.
That would be very inaccurate. UMAC is *not* a hash algorithm.
\/ o\ Paul Crowley, paul at ciphergoth.org
More information about the yadis