paul at ciphergoth.org
Wed Jun 8 12:40:03 PDT 2005
Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
> All that might change at this point are naming issues and I think we will
> use text/plain "key: value\n" response instead of URL-encoded.
I've updated the spec to use "key:value\n" (and used the same format for
the tokens, out of little more than obsessional personal neatness). Let
me know what naming changes you want. I suggest you be dictator for
this unless it strongly contravenes cryptographic practice, otherwise
we'll get into more bike shed discussions.
Incidentally, I see the secret fetching as doing double duty: all the
protocol negotiation stuff should happen then, so that we're not trying
to do something so complex while using redirects to communicate. This
is only an aside because there's no real negotiation in this first revision.
More information about the yadis