<html>
<body>
<font size=3><br>
</font><blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2 color="#000080">This is either a bug
in the spec or in the implementations. Only one of X-YADIS-Location
and X-XRDS-Location should be used, both should not be included as part
of the spec. I believe the spec should refer to X-YADIS-Location
and that is the one that should be used.</font></blockquote><br>
I apologize if my message was not clear. The spec is quite clear
and does not give any options. The relevant text is at
6.2.6.<br><br>
This is unchanged since Version 0.91.<br><br>
Saying it is courteous to look for X-YADIS-Location (or
X-Yadis-Location), i had in mind both Postel's law and a relaxed attitude
while implementations may be still in progress. There are certainly
good argument for being strict in what you accept. So i'll back off
a bit if others want to consider implementations that use
X-YADIS-Location to have a bug. I back of to this: I only meant it
is courteous to work for a while at least with an implementation that has
a bug.<br><br>
Cordially, Joaquin<br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<font face="Times New Roman, Times" size=3>Implementors:<br><br>
Here is a message from one of your fellow implementors. They were
having successful tests (that is: things weren't working).<br><br>
<br>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:28:25 -0700<br>
To: "Johannes Ernst" <jernst@netmesh.us><br>
Cc: ... Joaquin Miller <joaquin@netmesh.us><br><br>
Johannes:<br><br>
Quick update. The spec says to have a header with X-XRDS-Location but all
of the implementations look for X-YADIS-Location.<br><br>
Once we made the change all is working.<br><br>
Gary<br><br>
So remember, folks: It is courteous to look for X-YADIS-Location,
but, as we like to write using all caps:<br><br>
Implementations MUST look for
X-XRDS-Location.<br><br>
Cordially, Joaquin<br><br>
<br>
(p.s. The Caps Cops remind us: You can even look for X-Yadis-Location, if
you want.)</font></blockquote></body>
</html>