[RFC]: improve behaviour when using as an external component

Pedro Melo melo at simplicidade.org
Mon Feb 5 10:15:33 UTC 2007


Em Feb 5, 2007, às 8:05 AM, Martin Atkins escreveu:

> Michael Scherer wrote:
>> using "standalone yes", then setting the c2s port will have a  
>> different
>> impact than doing it in the reverse order, and i think this can be  
>> quite
>> confusing. I am not very keen of having a option that act like  
>> some kind of alias
>> for 2 other options, it can only lead to confusion.
> I'm inclined to agree. I wonder if the following could work:
> ClientPort none
> ServerPort none

eheh :)

I coded that one first, then went for the other because I wanted to  
disable some warnings about Local delivery components also...

Im fine with both... No clear preference.

Do you want my patch to support none as a port?

Best regards,
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
Jabber ID: melo at simplicidade.org
Use Jabber!

More information about the Djabberd mailing list