JID case sensitivity
alexmv at bestpractical.com
Thu Apr 30 16:47:53 UTC 2009
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 09:46 -0700, Martin Atkins wrote:
> What is the back-compact impact of this on sites that do not use the flag?
> This is only an issue for systems that have existing, non-normalized
> JIDs in their RosterStorage, right?
Correct -- well, any persistent storage of JIDs which your djabberd
might have, but roster storage is the most likely.
> If so, I'll commit this patch. I assume that most folks won't actually
> need to use the back-compat flag since most folks will have normalized
> JIDs stored.
It's worth putting a caution in the changelog, since they're apparently
more common than I originally thought, as well.
More information about the Djabberd