C based client
Fri, 02 Jan 2004 17:06:24 -0800
Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I believe it's all been a lot of talk.
Thats too bad :(
> I'm interested to hear more about your Apache module, if you'd care
> elaborating. Apache 1.3 or 2.0? Works in conjunction with any/which auth
> modules? You currently hitting performance problems with your existing
The module I am writing is for Apache 2.1 only (No Official releases,
only in CVS -head). The Auth System in Apache was completely changed in
2.1. It allows you to register "providers" for the Basic and Digest
AuthName "basic testing area"
AuthBasicProvider dbi file
The AuthBasicProvider can be a list of authn_* modules to provide the
username and password validation. This is much more flexible than how
authentication is handled in 1.3 and 2.0.
Anyways, my module is called mod_authn_cache and it registers as a
provider for Digest and Basic. Other Authn Modules will register as
providers for the cache module. This allows a transparent caching of
AuthName "soap protected area"
I would like to use memcached for a proprietary module that talks to a
SOAP based back end to authenticate users. (this back end is out of my
control) The SOAP back end is rather slow and stops requests from
completing quickly. So, my plan was to use memcached as one possible
back end for mod_authn_cache. (other possible back ends might be local
shared memory, or perhaps in process hash tables).
I also use mod_authn_dbi to authenticate other clients. This can use
MySQL/PgSQL/SQLite databases. It pools database connections(very nice
with the Worker MPM) and it's performance has never been an issue.
Check out http://mod-auth.sourceforge.net/ for more info.
mod_authn_dbi is already on there, along with a couple other modules
under development for the new 2.1 Auth API.
> - Brad
> On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Paul Querna wrote:
>>I am working on adding memcached into an apache module(caching
>>authentication results, the module will be open source). There have
>>been several mentions on the list archive of various people starting on
>>a C library for memcached, but no one has posted their source code. Has
>>any progress on this been made, or should I just write my own from scratch?
>>If even a partially completed library is done, I would be interested in
>>using it as a starting point.