New feature: refresh [patch]...
mogsie at escenic.com
Thu Nov 25 01:10:46 PST 2004
On on , 2004-11-24 at 12:15 -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> That said, I've added a new command to memcached(8) called "refresh".
> refresh behaves *exactly* the same as get, except that it refreshes the
> expiration of the item based off of the original expiration time
> provided by the client.
Isn't this strikingly similar (identical?) in function to my request for
addition of "touch"? Or have I missed something?
I agree that the Subject: header was misleading, but I wasn't sure of
how else one might use a "refresh" / "touch" command. But refreshing
sessions like you describe is actually using memcached as a second level
cache, isn't it? :-) The primary cache being the session object in the
More information about the memcached