memcached vs squid
Daryn Nakhuda
daryn at spamarrest.com
Wed Nov 9 11:07:40 PST 2005
We use memcached for caching all sorts of good stuff at Spam Arrest, and it
works great for us.
I have a new project coming up that is going to require caching, but rather
than just objects/data, I will probably be able to cache entire html
documents.
That said, I’m trying to decide between using memcached or squid in reverse
proxy mode for caching the pages.
1. internet -> squid -> webserver -> db
or
2. internet -> webserver -> memcached -> db
(well, not exactly, but you get the idea).
Any opinions or stong arguments for one or the other? I’ve used both
heavily in the past and can really think of pros/cons for either.
Thanks,
Daryn
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/163 - Release Date: 11/8/2005
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/attachments/20051109/fe105585/attachment.htm
More information about the memcached
mailing list