memcached vs squid
    Daryn Nakhuda 
    daryn at spamarrest.com
       
    Wed Nov  9 11:07:40 PST 2005
    
    
  
We use memcached for caching all sorts of good stuff at Spam Arrest, and it
works great for us. 
 
I have a new project coming up that is going to require caching, but rather
than just objects/data, I will probably be able to cache entire html
documents. 
 
That said, I’m trying to decide between using memcached or squid in reverse
proxy mode for caching the pages. 
 
1.	internet -> squid -> webserver -> db 
or
2.	internet -> webserver -> memcached -> db
 
(well, not exactly, but you get the idea). 
 
 
Any opinions or stong arguments for one or the other?  I’ve used both
heavily in the past and can really think of pros/cons for either. 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Daryn
 
 
 
-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/163 - Release Date: 11/8/2005
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/attachments/20051109/fe105585/attachment.htm
    
    
More information about the memcached
mailing list