Possible use for memcache?

[mike]

You should work on porting MogileFS to FUSE finally, so it doesn't
have to be coded into the specific application and would just be a
transparent filesystem to everything else :) Maybe cut down using HTTP
and make it a quicker, proprietary daemon like memcached, to save the
protocol overhead?

</random ideas>

- mike

On 11/28/05, Brad Fitzpatrick <brad at danga.com> wrote:
> For a cache, it's fine.
>
> I wouldn't trust its failover modes for a filesystem.
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, mike wrote:
>
> > Brad! Are you telling me memcached isn't perfect?!?!?!
> >
> > :)
> >
> > On 11/28/05, Brad Fitzpatrick <brad at danga.com> wrote:
> > > Then you haven't seen all the failure cases.  :-)
> > >
> > > - Brad
> >
> >
>