Possible use for memcache?
mike503 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 17:50:22 PST 2005
You should work on porting MogileFS to FUSE finally, so it doesn't
have to be coded into the specific application and would just be a
transparent filesystem to everything else :) Maybe cut down using HTTP
and make it a quicker, proprietary daemon like memcached, to save the
On 11/28/05, Brad Fitzpatrick <brad at danga.com> wrote:
> For a cache, it's fine.
> I wouldn't trust its failover modes for a filesystem.
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, mike wrote:
> > Brad! Are you telling me memcached isn't perfect?!?!?!
> > :)
> > On 11/28/05, Brad Fitzpatrick <brad at danga.com> wrote:
> > > Then you haven't seen all the failure cases. :-)
> > >
> > > - Brad
More information about the memcached