why memcached is called a object cache

[Ivan Krstić]

zhang Jackie wrote:
>    As we all know, memcached is a object cache. But why it is not called
> object-oriented cache?

It isn't actually an object cache; it's a 'named bunches of bytes'
cache. Object orientation, or the lack thereof, happens at the client
API level -- memcached couldn't care less.

-- 
Ivan Krstić <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> | GPG: 0x147C722D