Suggestion for future version of memcached?

Jehiah Czebotar jehiah at
Sat Dec 30 08:10:31 UTC 2006

> 2. support standard file operations, so we can use standard file
> system call to write & read the data, where in some language,
> memcached api is not available, e.g. VBS. on the other hand, this can
> be a NFS running on memory,

why not just write a memcache client library in VBS? that seems quite
a bit simpler, and more usefull. It shouldnt be that hard; the
protocol spec is pretty clear

More information about the memcached mailing list