PECL memcache extension
Brian Moon
brianm at dealnews.com
Tue Feb 7 17:28:37 UTC 2006
> 2 - I have this working *today*. Again, it's not very difficult. The
> only reason for the thread is to see if there's interest in extending
> the PECL extension to support this sort of scenario. I happen to think
> it's very useful - you get all of the speed of memcached with next to no
> worry about stale reads, even in multi-server failure scenarios. What's
> not to like?
What I do not like is that while a node is out, my database is getting
hit over and over when their is supposed to be a cache. We use
memcached so that we don't repeat database requests over and over.
Of course, if this is an option then no worries. I just won't turn it on.
Brian.
More information about the memcached
mailing list