Deletes Are Driving Me Crazy
jeff.rodenburg at gmail.com
Wed Jan 11 17:24:48 UTC 2006
On 1/11/06, Matthew Glubb <matt at zgroupplc.com> wrote:
> I simply wish to be able to delete a key that has a zero expiry
> period and then immediately be able to add a key of the same name.
> The reason that I cannot use set is because if it already exists in
> the cache I do not want to replace the value.
I have a somewhat similar requirement, but I'm curious about this specific
approach. It sounds as if an object may go into the cache with a given key,
but in some scenarios if that key is already in use, that object would use a
different key in the cache. Is that accurate?
This sound as if you might be using the cache as a queue or something to
delineate prioritization or ordering.
I know this doesn't resolve the particular add/delete/add scenario, but I'm
curious about the requirements side.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the memcached