invalidation by namespace Re: Listing all keys on a server: why?

Serhat Sakarya serhat at
Sat Jul 29 20:33:48 UTC 2006

On 7/29/06, Don MacAskill <don at> wrote:

> If Server A crashes for a few minutes, and Servers B-Z get remapped data,
> and then Server A recovers and Servers B-Z aren't flushed, then there exists
> the likelihood that you'll read bad data from Servers B-Z again if Server A
> should fail.

What do you think about giving the remapped data on servers B-Z a low
expiration time? This will get them flushed rather quickly. Then stale data
will only be an issue if server A fails again within that short time period.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the memcached mailing list