flush_all is broken?

Brian Moon brianm at dealnews.com
Sat May 13 22:26:19 UTC 2006

Martin Blais wrote:
> Am I missing something about the meaning of flush_all?
> I just tested with 1.1.13-pre, and I get the same problem.

This has been covered on the list before.  The flush is not as atomic as 
you might think.  Immediate sets after a flush "could" happen before the 
flush occurs.

I believe there was a patch proposed to make this not happen.  Check the 
list archives.


Brian Moon
Its good to be cheap =)

More information about the memcached mailing list