Simple questions from memcached newbie
Brad Fitzpatrick
brad at danga.com
Thu Oct 12 00:38:13 UTC 2006
Because we want to do more than 10 operations per second. :)
But what would that even buy us? Not distributed like NDB.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, NTPT wrote:
> and what about SQLITE as storage backend ?
> (just dumb question....)
>
>
> > ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
> > Od: Andy <memcached at thwartedefforts.org>
> > Předmět: Re: Simple questions from memcached newbie
> > Datum: 12.10.2006 00:37:10
> > ----------------------------------------
> > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 12:45 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> > > On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Jeetendra Mirchandani wrote:
> > >
> > > > Going a little off topic here, has somebody worked on writing a data
> > > > redundancy layer over memcached?
> > > >
> > > > What I would love to have is memcached servers talking to each other
> > > > maintaining replicas, so that even if a server goes down, the data is
> > > > not lost.
> > >
> > > The default reply is "you want MySQL Cluster".
> > >
> > > Since people keep wanting to use the memcached interface for this,
> > > maybe MySQL Cluster (as in NDB) could be a storage backend for
> > > memcached.
> >
> > The difference here is that memcached is at least an order of magnitude
> > easier to setup and maintain than MySQL cluster, and adding an
> > additional "storage backend" on memcached means you need to maintain two
> > sets of software (memcached and mysql cluster) rather than one (for no
> > advantage really, since NDB is a memory based store, just like
> > memcached) resulting in increased complexity.
> >
> > A memcached client interface on MySQL would help people transition,
> > ahem, away from memcached (or it might bring users into the fold).
> >
> > Memcached remains dead simple to setup and dead simple to use and dead
> > simple to make more "reliable", by either changing your client code to
> > make the client "smarter" (to send/try multiple servers, for example),
> > or by adding additional nodes to reduce the percentage of data on any
> > single node to whatever low amount you feel is appropriate. These are
> > most definitely _virtues_ of memcached.
> >
> > --
> > Andy <memcached at thwartedefforts.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the memcached
mailing list