memcached "backends" (was Re: Simple questions from
garthpatil at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 12 01:43:38 UTC 2006
>From: Andy <memcached at thwartedefforts.org>
>To: Memcached list <memcached at lists.danga.com>
>Subject: memcached "backends" (was Re: Simple questions from
>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:40:53 -0500
>On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 00:47 +0200, NTPT wrote:
> > and what about SQLITE as storage backend ?
> > (just dumb question....)
>Could make sense, although since memcached is just key/value pairs, and
>is not a relational database, something along the lines of db4 might
>make more sense and be a better functional/feature map.
>Wasn't someone already working on something like that?
>Andy <memcached at thwartedefforts.org>
More information about the memcached