Atomic replace and append operations
brianm at dealnews.com
Tue Oct 17 16:07:26 UTC 2006
On Fri Mar 18 13:54:00 PST 2005
Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I'm down for an atomic append operation, but I want to add
> virtual buckets and the trackers first, as it's kinda a
> prereq. Apps coded to just append all the time could get
> in trouple if there's a network blip. With the trackers,
> it'd be detected and wiped.
Are these prerequisites in the new releases? I am jonesing for appends
and atomic replacing.
It's good to be cheap =)
More information about the memcached