bashcoder+memcached at gmail.com
Tue Oct 24 13:04:35 UTC 2006
On 10/24/06, Moritz Maisel <maisel at sipgate.de> wrote:
> If there were 3 Servers X, Y and Z. A client uses cache Y. After that Y
> down. Now the client takes another cache. When B comes up again it is
> used by the client and we get outdated data ...
I would have thought that if Y goes down, the client goes to the
database(s). At least that's what I'm planning. If the client can't
connect it will go directly to the source. I mean, that's what the client
would have to do anyway if it could connect to the sever but the server
didn't have the data cached.
I'm a new user, and I love the idea of memcached but I don't think it was
designed to be reliable. It's not the Google filesystem. That's cool, as
long as I don't architect my system as though it were.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the memcached