Better explaination on homepage

[Serhat Sakarya]

I think it would be especially useful some common pitfalls and
considerations. For example, it may not be entirely intuitive that it's
actually good that some features like replication and iteration are missing.
Also, it would be good to list some common failure scenarios and how node
failures affect data validity.

Regards,

Serhat

On 10/31/06, howard chen <howachen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/1/06, Evert|Rooftop <evertpot at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the idea behind memcached isn't explained well enough on the
> > homepage.. Lots of people tend to ask the exact same quesion, and in my
> > experience thats not a general stupidity problem, but a communication
> > problem..
> >
> > I think it would reduce the duplicate questions if it was better
> > explained (especially the replication stuff)
> >
> > Evert
> >
>
> agree, maybe a wiki or forum would be a good choice
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/attachments/20061031/b1fa326b/attachment.htm