about 2G memory problem and connection
memory usage
Brian P Brooks
Brian.Brooks at Colorado.EDU
Tue Aug 7 17:28:24 UTC 2007
> > Is -m option for slabs not for malloc?
>
> >At the moment, yes, -m only sets the maximum size of the cache
> itself,
> not any of the other data structures. Those are allocated as needed.
> Do you mean that the -m option is only limit the memory allocate for
> the slabs?
> So what limit the other memory allocate?
>
> If I have 4G memory totaly,can I set -m option to 3000 ?
You should be able to fire up another instance of memcached to utilize as much memory as needed beyond the 2G barrier.
Is there a reason why there is a 2G barrier? Does this have any affect on performance going larger/smaller or running more instances? Would it be more effective to run 4 512mb instances rather than 2 2G instances?
Brian Brooks
More information about the memcached
mailing list