java memcached client & tomcat
David O'Dell
dodell at corp.meez.com
Thu Feb 8 19:38:01 UTC 2007
Greg I appreciate your response.
We are running with the defaults:
Define the pool
<value>192.168.173.92:11211,192.168.173.93:11211,192.168.173.94:11211,192.168.173.194:11211,192.168.173.195:11211</value>
They have an equal weight.
On one host I was concerned that we have MaxConn set too low so I set it
to 100 instead of the default of 50.
<name>max_spare_connections</name>
<value>100</value>
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 23:31 -0500, Greg Whalin wrote:
> This does not sound normal to me, and certainly does not mimic
> anything we have seen in production anytime since we started using
> memcached. How do you have the pool configured?
>
> Greg
>
> On 2/7/07, David O'Dell <dodell at corp.meez.com> wrote:
> We just deployed memcached to our tomcats last night.
> We have 6 webs running apache/tomcat with 5 memcached
> instances in the
> pool.
> Each instance has 1gb of space and already we have 20,000
> items cached
> taking up 2.5 gb of space.
>
> One surprise was the increase in load on the webs due to the
> network IO.
> I expected the load to increase but its more than doubled.
>
> Does anyone know if this it normal?
>
>
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:17 +0530, John Navil Joseph wrote:
> > Newbie to memcached here!
> >
> > Has anyone been using the java memcached client (available
> @whalin.com) with Apache Tomcat? Just interested in knowing
> how tried and tested/widely deployed the combination is.
> >
> > Also some pointers on using the SockIOPool connection pool
> mechanism with Tomcat will be helpful.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
>
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Whalin
More information about the memcached
mailing list