Cache miss stampedes
BUSTARRET, Jean-francois
jfbustarret at wat.tv
Thu Jul 26 08:39:03 UTC 2007
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : dormando [mailto:dormando at rydia.net]
> > Why not include probalistic expirations in the server ?
> >
>
> Not the best idea... That algorithm is completely dependent
> on the rate of incoming requests. Memcached's options
> (thankfully!) do not usually require on the fly tuning to work.
>
> Putting it into the server half defeats the purpose as well.
> The point of this game is to avoid cache misses and refresh
> caches to avoid a stampede/dogpile/whatever.
>
> -Dormando
You would not need tuning, and the rate of incoming requests is not a
problem IMHO.
- If the rate is very low, one can expect that there won't be any
stampede (unless the regeneration code is veeeeeeery slow, but this a
code tuning problem, and not a caching one)
- If the rate is moderate, it works fine
- If the rate is very high, I still prefer to 1% of requests
regenerating the key instead of 100% one minute later...
More information about the memcached
mailing list