is bigger really better, when it comes to memcached?

Marcus Bointon marcus at
Thu Jun 28 09:01:45 UTC 2007

On 28 Jun 2007, at 07:55, Adam Michaels wrote:

> But when only an attribute in one of the cache objects is updated,  
> only that cache object needs to be expired.

Why expire it? When you store your change, why not write the same  
change to memcache so that you don't incur the fall-through to the db  
on the next read?

Marcus Bointon
Synchromedia Limited: Creators of
UK resellers of info at hand CRM solutions
marcus at |

More information about the memcached mailing list