apr_memcache client memory usage
andre.cruz at co.sapo.pt
Tue Oct 16 08:16:38 UTC 2007
On 2007/10/16, at 02:17, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> AFAIK, you should create a sub pool first and pass that to the
And, ahem, isn't that what I'm doing? I create a sub-pool for each get
() to memcache and destroy it afterwards. I can't destroy the pool I
pass to memcache_server_create() since I need the server for the next
requests. Reconnecting to the server on each iteration is not a good
option I think.
Is the author of this client in the list? Would you guys recommend a
better c++ client that is stable?
More information about the memcached