Evaluating Memcached for our site. Looking for advice.
jallspaw at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 20 14:05:21 UTC 2007
I can chime in on this one easily:
>>4. What was the support overhead from a time and expertise standpoint
to maintain this?
memcached is probably the lowest-maintenance part of our infrastructure. I
have a lot of boxes like this:
storage4: 14:01:31 up 818 days, 18:57, 0 users, load average: 0.73, 0.70, 0.65
whose memcached instances would have lasted 818 days, except for the time we
upgraded to get the newer eviction stats in the most recent version. :)
other than that, it's like dial tone for us at Flickr.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the memcached