marcus at synchromedia.co.uk
Tue Oct 23 19:49:13 UTC 2007
On 23 Oct 2007, at 20:17, Brian Beuning wrote:
> One instance of memcached could handle our tiny 400 MB with no
> It can probably even handle the load of 100 processes hitting it.
> But I am
> concerned if memcached went down then we would miss our fixed time
> Ideally we would like to have a few memcached instances each with a
> copy of the 400 MB. The Wiki says memcached does not do replication.
Seems like the memcachedb project mentioned on here recently might be
a good fit for you. It's essentially a memcache front-end with a bdb
back end, so can survive restarts etc, while still serving some scary
Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/
UK resellers of info at hand CRM solutions
marcus at synchromedia.co.uk | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk/
More information about the memcached