dustin at spy.net
Wed Sep 5 16:23:29 UTC 2007
On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:10 , Brenton Alker wrote:
> I think the problem Dustin was describing though, was writing to the
> "secondary" cache, then that value being overwritten by the primary
> being replicated with older information.
No, it was the other one. You can write to the master, have it
replicated, write a new value, have the master die, and then read the
wrong value from the slave. That seems like a bad situation.
More information about the memcached