memcached replication

Dustin Sallings dustin at
Wed Sep 5 16:23:29 UTC 2007

On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:10 , Brenton Alker wrote:

> I think the problem Dustin was describing though, was writing to the
> "secondary" cache, then that value being overwritten by the primary
> being replicated with older information.

	No, it was the other one.  You can write to the master, have it  
replicated, write a new value, have the master die, and then read the  
wrong value from the slave.  That seems like a bad situation.

Dustin Sallings

More information about the memcached mailing list