Memcache CAS

[Dustin Sallings]

On Sep 17, 2007, at 0:31, Chris Goffinet wrote:

> 1) Okay. Does it make sense then to just implement a 'revision'  
> into the item struct? That way we can just revision++ on new 'set'?

	I think you'd need a global counter.  You wouldn't want a set ->  
delete -> set to tell you that your value is the same between those  
two sets.

> 2) I'll add support for those 3 again so you can see what happened.  
> I'll look into draining the output correctly so client's won't have  
> an issue with this.

	There's a drain state, but it ends strangely for the text protocol,  
I believe.

-- 
Dustin Sallings