Altering queries?

[Dustin Sallings]

On Sep 20, 2007, at 23:42, K J wrote:

> I suppose the main problem is this... If I wanted to store the  
> entire list, I would have to fetch the entire dataset from the DB,  
> whereas if I were doing it via SQL queries, I would use paging.
>
> Does this mean that I would, the first time a user logs in and  
> interacts with this list, to fetch the entire set instead of say  
> just page 1, then use the entire set when doing paging and other  
> organizing?

	You can do it in whatever way makes the most sense to you.   
Memcached should always be faster than the DB, and it's *much* easier  
to scale.  A cache miss means you have to do another request to get  
more data, and then do a cache set.  Otherwise, just imagine how you  
want something to work, think about this layer being cheap, and start  
experimenting.

-- 
Dustin Sallings


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/attachments/20070920/fd80e257/attachment.html