memcachedb 0.0.3 is released
stvchu at gmail.com
Sun Sep 30 01:23:38 UTC 2007
On 9/29/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> Steve Chu wrote:
> > Memcachedb uses Berkeley DB as a storing
> > backend, so lots of features including transaction and replication are
> > supported.
> Is Berkeley DB considered reliable these days?
Any other db alternative, I mean reliable and high performance of read
Can you make some suggestion? We also need replication feature that
Berkeley DB supports.
> I've had problems with
> it in the past, particularly when values were replaced with larger sizes
> for existing keys, and I believe the subversion project moved away from
> it as the default data store.
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the memcached