memcachedb 0.0.3 is released

Steve Chu stvchu at
Sun Sep 30 01:23:38 UTC 2007

On 9/29/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at> wrote:
> Steve Chu wrote:
> > Memcachedb uses Berkeley DB as a storing
> > backend, so lots of features including transaction and replication are
> > supported.
> Is Berkeley DB considered reliable these days?
Any other db alternative, I mean reliable and high performance of read
and write?
Can you make some suggestion? We also need replication feature that
Berkeley DB supports.

> I've had problems with
> it in the past, particularly when values were replaced with larger sizes
> for existing keys, and I believe the subversion project moved away from
> it as the default data store.
> --
>    Les Mikesell
>     lesmikesell at

Steve Chu

More information about the memcached mailing list