Notes from the fourth memcached hackathon of undetermined
tmaesaka at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 17:58:15 UTC 2008
Awesome notes, thanks :D something else worth noting that we discussed
was getting rid of the single thread code asap and making the code in
Hopefully this will be done to the binary tree next weekish.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dustin Sallings <dustin at spy.net> wrote:
> Last night was pretty good. As far as I know, we made progress in
> two areas:
> * multi-storage interface
> * finalizing the last complaints of the binary protocol
> # Multi Storage Interface
> As for the multi-storage interface, Toru showed us some decent code
> and we talked a bit about how it works and possibly can work.
> Any lock around data storage belongs in the engine. The core server
> will not enforce any kind of locking. There are also locks around the
> connection data structure pool which nobody really cares about (if it's a
> performance problem, don't connect as much), and some locks around stats
> outside of the engine.
> Stats are ugly. Some *must* live outside of the engine (e.g.
> rusage) and some *must* live inside of the engine (e.g. curr_items). An
> engine will have an engine-stats specific function that takes a context and
> a callback and makes one callback per key/value pair of engine-specific
> stats as it sees appropriate based on the context (which includes a
> parameter to satisfy item stats requests).
> Possibly more happened here, but it was late and few people slept
> much the night before. Someone please fill in more detail. :)
> # Binary Protocol
> Symmetry is important and was a major goal here. There were two
> dimensions of asymmetry we rectified (comparison to the text protocol and
> the packet structure itself). Don't stop reading yet, though, because
> details follow:
> ## Command Equality
> Four commands were missing altogether from the binary spec that had
> made it into the text protocol, and one was missing some functionality that
> seemed ridiculous, but someone, somewhere uses:
> * quit (Trond sent a patch)
> * prepend
> * append
> * flush's time bomb
> * stats (are ugly)
> The first three are obvious.
> In the text protocol, flush_all takes a parameter that causes the
> server to behave normally for a while and then suddenly drop the cache after
> a bit of time. I think this confuses people, but if we can't remove it from
> one protocol, we can't omit it from the other.
> Stats are ugly and required a lot of thought. We tried to hold of
> on designing a mechanism as long as we could (Trond suggested we wait for,
> you know, someone to care), but in the end, we decided to do something like
> an implied multi-get since Dormando claims to care a lot. Enough to
> implement it anyway. :)
> A stats command is issued with a single string parameter, and the
> server returns multiple responses, each containing a key, and a string
> value. A terminating packet indicates the server has nothing more to say.
> [We didn't really talk about the details of this, but I'd recommend
> terminating with a stat with a 0 length key and 0 length value.]
> ## New Commands
> Brian made his case for get returning a key (sometimes). We solved
> this problem by adding a get command that returns a key. I'll call it getk
> and hopefully remember why after I hit send. So there are now *four* get
> commands in the binary protocol:
> * get (returns an object or error; does not return key)
> * getq (returns an object; does not return missing; does not return
> * getk (returns an object with key or error)
> * getkq (returns an object with key; does not return missing)
> We also defined semantics for a setq command:
> * setq (does not return in the normal case, opaque identifies
> These commands do not currently have command IDs reserved.
> ## Packet Header
> Brian pointed out that CAS as I imagined it left him with a feeling
> of incompleteness that could only by resolved by putting CAS on everything.
> Set now returns a CAS ID (of the newly created object), delete honors a CAS
> ID (delete the object with this key iff it has this value).
> We accomplished this by moving the CAS identifier up into the
> standard header in both directions. Yes, you can now request a version with
> a CAS and you'll get the version back with a CAS. Hopefully nobody decides
> that the value is important here and should be honored.
> We also put key length back into the response header (by eating the
> reserved at byte 6). Any response may now include a key and every packet
> sniffer should be happy to see it (note that this makes the implementations
> of getk and stat really obvious, too).
> While messing around with the header, we swapped the location of
> this new key length in the response and the status. With this change, we
> have the same packet structure for both directions with the exception of the
> request reserve being used as a response status.
> # Other Items
> Brian gets paid in strange ways.
> Dustin Sallings
More information about the memcached