Notes from the fourth memcached hackathon of undetermined
mike503 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 22:44:16 UTC 2008
On 4/16/08, Dustin Sallings <dustin at spy.net> wrote:
> Clients and servers benefit greatly from *not* having miss messages.
> Imagine needing 1,000 keys for which only 100 are actually in the server.
> You could issue 1,000 quiet gets and a noop (or 999 getq commands and a get)
> and only have to deal with hits. The misses are implied.
Yeah I suppose it's a lot of extra overhead.
It looks like it is still at the client level I want to tweak for my
needs. Just wondering if it would be even simpler if the server itself
returned cache miss info. Then the client could pass that through
More information about the memcached