michael.wieher at gmail.com
Fri Apr 18 14:45:45 UTC 2008
Well, I'm not sure either, but some googling brough up a buncha msdn2
/ asp related things.... I sorta glanced and it seems like a FIFO
idea, more or less, which brings up a question I have, although I have
no idea if the original poster was wondering this but um
time_t(0) when setting an object in the cache
....time passes....more objects get set....some time_t(0) some time_t(n)...
set-new-object time_t(0 or n) ... but cache is full...
does it reject the new object
or throw out the oldest time_t(0) object?
or throw out the oldest time_t(n) object where n>0 but n-has-expired?
if i wanted a pure FIFO cache, just set all expiration to NULL?
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Brian Moon <brianm at dealnews.com> wrote:
> Can you explain? I am not sure what you mean by sliding.
> Brian Moon
> On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:56 AM, "Simone Busoli" <simone.busoli at gmail.com>
> > Hello, I have a question about the expiration policy employed by
> Memcached. Does it support sliding expiration out of the box or does it have
> to be managed at the application level?
More information about the memcached